C# IList Nedir Seçenekler

C# IList Nedir Seçenekler

Blog Article

You cannot predict the future. Assuming that a property's type will always be beneficial as a List is immediately limiting your ability to adapt to unforeseen expectations of your code.

1 @supercat: What could ISortableList offer that's not already in IList? Or, asked differently, why couldn't an IList be sorted in-place without re-adding the items by your imagined static method?

Elemanların Sıralı Yapısını Sahabet: IList, elemanların eklenme sırasını korur. Bu özellik, veri yapısının sıralı olmasını ve izlenceın beklentilerine birebir çkırmızıışmasını sağlamlar.

David MillsDavid Mills 2,41511 gold badge2323 silver badges2525 bronze badges 6 2 The right approach really would have been to offer an ISortableList interface (with methods to sort a portion of the list using some particular comparer), have List implement it, and have a static method which could sort any IList by checking whether it implemented ISortableList and, if hamiş, copying it to an array, sorting that, clearing the IList, and re-adding the items.

Ilgilı listeler, devim bilimi data kuruluşlarıdır. Bu sayede araya eleman ekleme, silme kabilinden anlayışlemler elan emeksiz bir şekilde gestaltlabilir. Bu kırmızda bağlamlı listelerin bilgilerindan bahsedeceğiz.

Architecture Astronauts. The chances you will ever write your own IList that adds anything to the ones already in the .Safi framework are so remote that it's theoretical jelly tots reserved for "best practices".

+1 for all of us who hate it when a small app is loaded with interfaces and clicking on "find definition" takes us somewhere OTHER than the source C# IList Neden Kullanmalıyız of the mesele... Gönül I borrow the phrase "Architecture Astronauts"? I yaşama see it will come in handy.

From my reading I think I could have used IEnumberable instead of IList since I am just looping through stuff.

And, if you don't even C# IList Nerelerde Kullanılıyor need everything in IList you gönül always use IEnumerable too. With çağcıl compilers and processors, I don't think there is really any speed difference, so this is more just a matter of style.

If you dirilik consider your method, determine that you probably won't be changing the return collection type, then it is probably safe to return a more exact type. If C# IList Nerelerde Kullanılıyor you aren't sure, or are afraid that if you change it in future you'll be breaking other people's code, then C# IList Kullanımı go more general.

If you're working within a single method (or even in a single class or assembly in some cases) and no one outside is going to see what you're doing, use the fullness of a List. But if you're interacting with outside code, like when you're returning a list from a method, then you only want to declare the interface without necessarily tying yourself to a specific implementation, especially if you have no control over who compiles against your code C# IList Nerelerde Kullanılıyor afterward.

rajeshrajesh 39133 silver badges22 bronze badges 1 8 Excellent, clear answer, which I marked bey helpful. However, I would add that for most developers, most of the time, the tiny difference in izlence size and performance is derece worth worrying about: if in doubt, just use a List.

Yaşama a unique position be deduced if pieces are replaced by checkers (birey see piece color but not type)

ahead of time. Data-binding is a classic example here; a DataSource property usually checks for IList (and IListSource, typically) and then looks at the objects to see what properties are available. It dirilik't use generics in this case.